---

name: requesting-code-review description: | Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements author: obra license: category: debugging tags: Superpowers, 代码审查, PR说明, 风险提示 source: https://github.com/obra/superpowers/tree/main/skills/requesting-code-review

Jimu Platform Adaptation

This skill was imported from a third-party agent ecosystem. When running in Jimu, do not treat upstream host names or tool names as literal requirements. Map them to Jimu capabilities instead:

• Claude Code, Claude.ai, Copilot CLI, Codex, Gemini CLI, and OpenCode mean the current Jimu agent runtime unless the text is explicitly describing the upstream source.
• Upstream tool names such as Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Task, WebFetch, Skill, and TodoWrite are not Jimu tool names. Use Jimu file, shell, web/browser, skill, todo, and sub-agent tools where available.
• MCP-specific names such as microsoft_docs_search, microsoft_docs_fetch, Context7, or Aspire MCP are optional upstream integrations. Use them only if the corresponding MCP is configured in Jimu; otherwise use available web or document retrieval tools.
• Instructions to invoke or dispatch skills/subagents should be interpreted through Jimu's skill and sub-agent mechanisms, not through Claude Code/OpenCode/Copilot-specific APIs.

Requesting Code Review

Dispatch a code reviewer subagent to catch issues before they cascade. The reviewer gets precisely crafted context for evaluation — never your session's history. This keeps the reviewer focused on the work product, not your thought process, and preserves your own context for continued work.

Core principle: Review early, review often.

When to Request Review

Mandatory:

• After each task in subagent-driven development
• After completing major feature
• Before merge to main

Optional but valuable:

• When stuck (fresh perspective)
• Before refactoring (baseline check)
• After fixing complex bug

How to Request

1. Get git SHAs:

BASE_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD~1)  # or origin/main
HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)

2. Dispatch code reviewer subagent:

Use Jimu sub-agent delegation when available, filling the review brief from code-reviewer.md; otherwise perform a separate inline review pass with the same brief.

Placeholders:

• {DESCRIPTION} - Brief summary of what you built
• {PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS} - What it should do
• {BASE_SHA} - Starting commit
• {HEAD_SHA} - Ending commit

3. Act on feedback:

• Fix Critical issues immediately
• Fix Important issues before proceeding
• Note Minor issues for later
• Push back if reviewer is wrong (with reasoning)

Example

[Just completed Task 2: Add verification function]

You: Let me request code review before proceeding.

BASE_SHA=$(git log --oneline | grep "Task 1" | head -1 | awk '{print $1}')
HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)

[Dispatch code reviewer subagent]
  DESCRIPTION: Added verifyIndex() and repairIndex() with 4 issue types
  PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS: Task 2 from docs/superpowers/plans/deployment-plan.md
  BASE_SHA: a7981ec
  HEAD_SHA: 3df7661

[Subagent returns]:
  Strengths: Clean architecture, real tests
  Issues:
    Important: Missing progress indicators
    Minor: Magic number (100) for reporting interval
  Assessment: Ready to proceed

You: [Fix progress indicators]
[Continue to Task 3]

Integration with Workflows

Subagent-Driven Development:

• Review after EACH task
• Catch issues before they compound
• Fix before moving to next task

Executing Plans:

• Review after each task or at natural checkpoints
• Get feedback, apply, continue

Ad-Hoc Development:

• Review before merge
• Review when stuck

Red Flags

Never:

• Skip review because "it's simple"
• Ignore Critical issues
• Proceed with unfixed Important issues
• Argue with valid technical feedback

If reviewer wrong:

• Push back with technical reasoning
• Show code/tests that prove it works
• Request clarification

See template at: requesting-code-review/code-reviewer.md